A Plan B in case there is no consent on the outreach proposal

Hello @reef-coordination,

In sociocracy, when there is a problem with a team or between two teams, the guideline is to escalate it to the next higher circle. In this case this means that the outreach issue goes to the Coordination Group.

Preparing a Plan B until the end of the summer

Given the plenary’s conclusion that @reef-external will come up with a new proposal at the next plenary, I don’t think there is much to do for us on that front right now. Where I do think we have a responsibility to take up, is to make sure there is Plan B on the table, ready to consent to, in case we don’t manage to reach consent on Team External’s proposal. We are running a high stakes company, and the way I see it, it is urgent and important that we ensure that all tasks are attended to ASAP.

I personally don’t see it realistic nor helpful to call for a meeting with the entire group, so what I would like to propose is that we form a very short-lived Helping Circle. The HC’s mandate would be to prepare an easy-to-consent-to Plan B that would set out how we are going to make sure all outreach and external relations tasks are tended to until the next plenary (end of the summer). The Plan B will not take a position and it will still leave all the space in the world for Team External to present a revised proposal at the next plenary. It will just be a hands-on approach so that we can make sure our common interest is taken care of. In an ideal scenario we won’t need it, but just in case there won’t be consent, we will have something clear and easy to revert to for a short period of time.

Any objections to this approach?

  • No objections
  • I do have an objection (= potential risk to the group) and I will explain it in a post below
0 voters

Setting up the Helping Circle

The most logical members of the HC to me seem to be @Sterre and @GaultierDWM, because not only they were not involved in the conflict they are also part of our conflict management team, and I would say myself, because I know the outreach and external domains quite well based on past experience. Would you be up for that?

  • Yes I would be ok to be part of that HC
  • Nope I’d rather not
0 voters

Membership to all circles in The Reef is in theory open to everybody, so this is of course also true for this one. So if anybody else feels a calling, please don’t hesitate to join in.

I personally have an idea about how we could take this forward, so if that’s fine with you I could write that down, and then we could maybe meet 45 minutes some time during a lunch break, after work or in the evening one of the next days? (that doesn’t mean we have to go with my idea of course - I’ll share it beforehand and of course all other proposals will be equally welcome)

1 Like

I don’t think I will be very helpful, because I will be leaving on holidays in one week (FM meeting will be my last one).

Hey @Lee

I don’t rly follow for the helping circle.

If the purpose is to design a hands-on approach to outreach I don’t understand why team conflict management would be central.

I am okay with helping out reviewing and discussing this proposal as you suggested. However I don’t think I know enough about the outreach activities to give good substantial input.

Could you clarify this approach :slight_smile:

Thx!

1 Like

Hi @GaultierDWM,

Sorry if that got confusing. I guess what I was trying to say is that I figured it’s a nice extra that the two of you are also part of our peace-keeping team. The essence to me however is that we as the Coordination Group take responsibility. By virtue of not being involved in the current situation, I would say you qualify as an excellent discussant and reviewer of the Plan B that should be consented to if the first proposal doesn’t go through.

@Sterre ideally we should be ready with this before the end of this week. As I equally appreciate your peace-keeping skills, please know that your input will be very welcome (though no pressure of course).

To proceed: I’ll see whether I can put something on paper shortly, so that we have something to discuss in the next coming days. After that the idea would be to get online consent from the Coordination Group (if possible) and/or to get a review from at least one other person.

Works?

Alright, let’s do it!

Thank you for clarifying. I have time to review this Friday until the end of the day. I do want to stress, though, that I am confident that Team External will come with an appropriate proposal next PM.

As discussed during the last PM, we all agree on the different pools and their respective responsibilities. From my perspective, what’s most important now is to establish clear deadlines and a follow-up strategy for cases where those deadlines are not met. I’m confident that Team External has the resources and capacity to make this work.

3 Likes

To be clear: I also want to trust that from here on it will be smooth sailing, and at the same time I believe it’s important we take our responsibility just in case something gets in the way.

2 Likes

Hello @GaultierDWM and @Sterre,
Ping @reef-coordination,

I posted the draft proposal in the “proposals” folder of Team Reef. All feedback is welcome, if possible by Sunday evening. TIA!

Link: Login – Nextcloud

1 Like

Hi @Lee

My comments are in the proposal :slight_smile:

Thanks! I addressed them and/or replied to them in the text.

Hello @reef-coordination,

Following up to the original post above, I think it would be good if the Plan B could be brought to the plenary in the name of the Coordination Group.

Ideally we would have discussed this in a meeting, but then we are a remote organisation and there are already quite some meetings this week, so I would like to propose we try to deal with it online. Given that the proposal only focuses on taking care of the tasks that need doing, and that the proposal has a very limited term, I am hopeful that this should be easy.

Does anybody see an objection (i.e. risk to the group if this proposal goes through), or is this “good enough for now, safe enough to try”?

  • Good enough for now, safe enough to try
  • I have an objection and I will put it in this thread
0 voters

Also added 2 comments.

Thanks! I replied in the document.

sorry for the late reply… added one comment in the doc

Thanks! I replied to the comments in the document.

1 Like