How much access is real access than?
Thanks Marco, many money quotes in your comment !!
My understanding of Rune’s post is that research admittedly needs to be refined (“as long as assistive technology is not used it’s difficult to identify exactly where to improve it”) in ways that are more just to the users than current commercial research and the incentives that exist in that space. Since research lab + home brewed medical inventions and tools exist already and provide healthy tinkering and reflection around problems, then the easier question is then how to enlarge access to this kind of knowledge, enable more people to be players. More access could mean better quality and approach to safeguards, and then markets (should) follow. Hopefully before research and money go down the drain or results made irrelevant.