I would add on top of this/first priority is an audit of the current workflow and experience of the different people who needs are to be met followed by a clear description of the experience that would be needed and specs for different steps of the flow. Only then look at the further development of the modules of this webkit so that they are coherent with the needs of the process and people involved in it.
There are three elements to this:
- conducting user research/ collect feedback from people involved in two projects this year: Edgeryders Festival and Science fiction economics lab
- visualising this as the “current” flow of steps and description of what did/did not work well
- proposing a different flow: with specs for how the modules would need to work in order to enable this improved flow, then collecting feedback from people and proposing a final version based on this.
Those that we would need to be involved in this process are:
- coordinators responsible for the final outcomes
- people who registered then participated in the events
- community members who organised local events (edgeryders festival)
- people who came on board to support the organisers of the local events
- Community management lead of the platform (Maria, John, Noemi, Jasen, Zmorda, Sohayeb + +)
- People who set up the different components using third party services (e.g Augusto and Owen)
- Project coordinators (Marina and Ilaria respectively)
- Research team leads (Alberto and Amelia)
So there would need to be some accounting for this in the timeline and budget