Notes from preliminary partners meeting Feb 4th

Good work

And apologies to everyone for not making it, I had a glitch.

Two questions:

  1. is everybody clear on what we want to do? Everything is clear in my head after the methodological note that has been circulated. Does everybody agree on it, so we can move on?
  2. I don't understand: if Guy thinks LABRI could be a lead partner, why are we considering looking for another one? Is there any specific thing that makes KITE, or Lulea, or Wuppertal attractive?

And one remark: not sure about the European consultant. I would feel more comfortable with a lead partner, not only for steering the writing of the proposal but the delivery of the project too.