Do you have an opinion about how you and other researchers would like comments being exported to RQDA?:
In the same text (RQDA "file") as the node, separated just with newlines from the node / other comments, and with metadata (author, date, link etc.) as text above them. Or
Each comment in its own text (RQDA "file"), again with metadata as text above the comment.
Because, this part of the exporting is yet to be done and I wonder how is better.
I would vote for having it in the same file, as for me it is easier to work with less separate files. And yes, autocomplete is an awesome function! I tried it already, it makes coding so much easier.
Here’s my view of what we will try to finish until we provide the initial release at end of the month:
Sidebar interface, listing all public tags and allowing to hide and unhide them. Implementation handled in #50. (by: not clear yet, hopefully @danohu )
Export button in the sidebar interface. (by: Matthias)
Tag merging functionality via Tagadelic. (by: Matthias)
Exporting comments and comment annotations to RQDA. (by: Matthias)
Making the quotation manager HTML aware (by: Matthias)
Let us know in case something critical is amiss for the first release.
You might have looked for the pencil icon after selecting text in a comment, but that’s only coming with the update tomorrow. For now, try annotating node text. I don’t know what other reason there could be … if the problem persists, try a different browser to let us exclude cache and browser issues.
And Noemi, on a “node view” page like this one, don’t you have the “View annotations” small vertical piece to the right? If you have it, click it, it will open the sidebar.
Just installed the new Open Ethnographer 1.0 version, and it will allow to annotate nodes and comment body fields now (or, when changing configuration, any other text field as well, incl. title fields).