Plenary meeting 25/03/26

Hello @reeflings,

After Monday’s/yesterday’s great news, the Helping Circle on the unit attribution would like to move forward quickly and is working on a proposal to be presented at the next plenary. As this is a cruical topic, please fill in the poll to say whether you’ll be there:

  • Yes, I’ll be there
  • I can’t make it
0 voters

As for the venue, @Lee, @joannes, anyone else…?

Let’s get ‘em plans ready :raising_hands:

5 Likes

@reeflings, the agenda for Wednesday’s plenary is ready, the links to the documents will be added tomorrow.

About the venue: @LuciaM and @AlinT have kindly offered to host us this time. Is everyone ok with that?

7 Likes

Hi
I think you are trying to tag a different @lucia

Thanks
Lucia Caistor

2 Likes

Hello again @reef-full, As there are still a few outstanding questions about the units, layouts and personal choices, moving the plenary by a few days might lead to a clearer and more appeasing outcome. So here is another poll to see how many of us could make it to an online plenary this Sunday. Please choose as many slots that you could make work as possible:

  • 10-12.30
  • 12.30-15
  • 15-17.30
  • 17.30-20
  • 20-22.30
0 voters
2 Likes

Oh… I can’t this Sunday :slightly_frowning_face: . I really want to attend this meeting, though. Is it definite that we move the plenary to Sunday?

3 Likes

Hey @Sterre, I feel you. Let’s see what the numbers (compared to 11 people on Wednesday) and the helping circle on the unit attribution say.

2 Likes

Saw the poll , no sure will make to either of the dates.

Can’t make it neither coming sunday and wouldn’t want to do this online

3 Likes

I don’t think online is the right format for this topic to be honest.

3 Likes

I agree with @mieke :slightly_smiling_face:

i think there has been a misunderstanding, the goal is to have it in person…

I can’t make it on Sunday 29/3 neither :pensive:

Hi @reef-full

Things are a bit messy at this moment (architects who could only meet with Sophie & Manoj today for the layout of O9, the discovery of the extra m2 added to the Asterix 2 BRs, a glitch in the approach of the HC to come to a proposal about the unit attribution, no answer yet on the Idefix simplexes,…).

This makes us come to the conclusion that the PM of tomorrow comes too early, which Sophie already somehow mentionned. The PM of tomorrow is cancelled but if you feel the need to come together to exchange/discuss, by all means.

So how we see us coming out of this mess:

- Tomorrow we will send out a survey about the unit preferences, to be filled in by everyone by friday evening. Based on this we will work on a proposal that will be the basis for a discussion in the next PM.

- We hope to have this PM either Sunday, Monday or Tuesday, in person. So here a new poll to know your availabilities, please fill it in by Wednesday 25/03 21:00.

Sorry for the confusion, please bear with us…

  • Sunday 10:00 - 12:30
  • Sunday 12:30 - 15:00
  • Sunday 15:00 - 17:30
  • Sunday 17:30 - 20:00
  • Sunday 20:00 - 22:30
  • Monday 18:00 - 20:30
  • Monday 19:00 - 21:30
  • Monday 19:30 - 22:00
  • Monday 20:00 - 22:30
  • Tuesday 18:00 - 20:30
  • Tuesday 19:00 - 21:30
  • Tuesday 19:30 - 22:00
  • Tuesday 20:00 - 22:30
  • i can’t make it on any of these moments
0 voters
6 Likes

Maybe too early to know, but will it be in Molenbeek or elsewhere? My responses would change depending on the location.

hi @MariaAM

No idea yet.

Maybe say for which dates it would need to be in location X (and specify X as well), and we’ll try to make the puzzle

1 Like

No worries, we’ll find the way to adapt.

1 Like

date of the PM: Tuesday 31/03 from 19:30 - 22:00

@LuciaM : still ok if it happens at yours?

2 Likes

I think it would be better to have this at @joannes (he confirmed it is possible).

6 Likes

hi, from team External I’ve been talking to students at KULeuven who have an assignment to help a budding co-housing community in Brussels to take off. I felt it might be a good idea for one of them (not all three) to participate in the PM as an observer, much like the AM. Would anyone object? Here’s their introductory mail:

" We are first-year master’s students at KU Leuven, currently taking the elective course “Socio-Spatial Design Agency” taught by Aurélie De Smet. As part of this course, we are collaborating with the organization Stadsklooster, which focuses on optimizing, financing, and organizing collective housing initiatives for its community. The group is a religious community looking for an affordable place to live together, with additional space to temporarily host others in need.

Within our assignment, we are researching similar initiatives: collective housing projects for religious, social, or otherwise community-oriented groups.

We came across your website and found your initiative very interesting, and we were wondering if it would be possible to meet (either in person or online) to ask you a few questions about your experience and process.

Maybe this plenary is not the right one? It’s FM only as we will be discussing the pontentially touchy subject of the new unit attribution.

4 Likes