Using theater as ethnography blurs the line between what is and what could be; in others words, between what is and what ought to be.
Barbara Dennis
Description
Induce a semantic social network from a collective improvisational writing process. A group of 10-20 people will engage in a month-long online collective writing process where each act in a character of their choosing, similar to live role playing or improvisation theatre. No specific background or theme is provided, but the story emerges from the collective effort of their characters. A second group of people acts collaboratively in the role of ethnographer, continuously analysing the produced content to distinguish emerging patterns as codes.
Background
SSNA has so far not been made on an autotelic or non-instrumental social network, i.e. a conversation or group without a specific purpose tied to real life issues. We believe it would be interesting to see what concepts and conceptual maps emerge from a non-instrumental process. There is several reasons we think this research might be interesting:
SSNA as an artform
The resulting SSNA becomes an artwork in itself, as an abstracted concept map of an improvised process. We believe there is potential to exhibit this project as a freestanding artwork, explaining the process and telling the story.
How do we display this artwork? A book? Website?
Mapping collective narrative evolution
Understand the evolution of narratives in collective processes. Could potentially be relevant research for other collective creative processes such as participatory events.
SSNA and performance ethnography
Improvisation theatre has been used as a tool for ethnography in the past, and ‘performance ethnography’ seem to be somewhat of a discipline in itself. Norman Denzin has written extensively on the topic and an example of it being used is Dara Culhane’s use of improv in her “Stories and Plays” project. SSNA is itself a form of experimental ethnography so it makes sense to test combining it with other forms.
Improvisation is also in itself a basis for all culture making. In intentional ways as in example Theatre of the Oppressed (which has been used extensively in ethnographic research, for example Barbara Dennis Unityville project) or the use of improvised poetry as political discourse in Yemeni tribes, but also in every act of procreating and manifesting any culture. “We are all expert improvisers of the quotidian,” as Bourdieu would have it.
Testing the limits of ethnographic coding
A sort of stress-test of the SSNA process in itself, by using it on an autotelic / non-instrumental process the functioning of the coding process becomes more apparent. E.g. in a community conversation about say water management the coding of keywords might be somewhat apparent. Specific techniques, regulations and tools gets codified into keywords. However, there might be certain qualities in the way things are said, formulated and presented that gets lost in the focus on the specifics of the topic - water management. This risks loosing the vital information about how this community works, their flavour or vibe so to say.
In this experiment the codes will not be limited to specific objects, but extended to also include vaguer concepts such as vibes, writing styles, and more broader general themes. Examples: “gloomy” - includes pieces of content that fits this specific vibe, “linguistically playful” - includes pieces of content that plays with the language itself, “polemic” - includes pieces of content that goes into polemic against other pieces of content.
Letting the SSNA influence the improvsation process
Lather (1991) developed the phrase catalytic validity to refer to research projects whose
validity rests, in part, on the effects they inspire for those involved in the study.
Processes
We have a number of different ideas around the processes, listed here. Nothing set in stone of course.
Characters
Character - a contributor of content to the story.
A group of people willing to commit a portion of their time during one month.
How do we select these people? They need to be both good writers and comfortable improvisers. Actors, writers, etc.
Is there a need for a vetting process? (Regarding the artwork-potential of the project a vetting process might be necessary to ensure some sort of quality.)
Story - Writing process
Story - the full selection of content produced by the characters.
The writing occur on a forum, most probably a sectioned off branch of Edgeryders. The writing occur continuously, and every participant is encouraged to engage with and produce content as often as they like.
The content might be posts or comments to post (is there other types of content?). The content need to be of a minimum size to be codeable, so dialogue-style interaction is discouraged. There ought probably also be a maximum size and volume of each writer to not risk creating unanalysable amounts of data.
The only rule is yes-and which means that each contributor must assume previous contributions as true and valid. This is a common tool within improvisation theatre to keep the creative energy flowing whatever direction it takes, reducing the risk of creative stalling and competing ideas.
This is not a pass-the-paragrah game since each contributer acts as a character, and the story is continuously unfolding without specific turns.
Analysers - Ethnographers
Analysers - the group of people acting as the ethnographer doing the coding
A group of committed people that are willing to put in time to analyse and code the resulting text. This group will work collectively as one ethnographer, using a group chat to collectively decide coding.
This ethnographer can potentially also act as a character in the story, presenting their result at specific moments, thus also influencing the direction the story is taking and introducing a level of catalytic validity (A phrase developed by social theorist Patti Lather to refer to research projects whose validity rests, in part, on the effects they inspire for those involved in the study.)
This group will be trained in ethnographical coding techniques, training payed for by Participio (see project plan.)
Analysis process
Coding of the content
In this experiment the codes will not be limited to the specific objects, but extended to also include vaguer concepts such as vibes, writing styles, and more broader general themes. Examples:
Gloomy - includes pieces of content that fits this specific vibe
Linguistically playful - includes pieces of content that plays with the language itself
Polemic - includes pieces of content that goes into polemic against other pieces of content.
Project Plan
Hugi has suggested to put a small portion of Participio money towards this, that would go to training the group doing analysis in ethnographic techniques.
Questions:
How do we present this as an art project?
What would be a good title of the project?
Should preferably include ‘edge’ somehow.
How do we select the contributors?
They need to be both good writers and comfortable improvisers. Actors, writers, etc.
Is there a need for a vetting process? (Regarding the artwork-potential of the project a vetting process might be necessary to ensure some sort of quality.)
Somewhat relevant sources:
Article exploring the improvisational aspects of ethnography
https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1176-improvisation
Ethnographic use of Theatre of the Oppressed (improv tool) for research purposes
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/160940690900800208
Research into the ontology/performativity/doing of ethnographic fieldwork
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d3bf/e022998b939570b0fc6078e2742a5748daad.pdf
Yemeni culture use improvised poetry as their main tool for discussion and ritual, in everything from weddings, to war mediations and state politics.