(I lost track a bit of the different threads on the statutes, so feel free to move my post elsewhere)
@alberto if memory serves there was another issue that came up at the last moment, which is the conditions for the exclusion of a member. In Article 9.7 it currently says that it’s the Board or the Comité de Sages that can take this decision, but at some point I think @Sarah brought this up, and then when we looked at the statutes of the asbl, where it says it’s either the Board or the GA that decides with a 2/3 majority (Article 9§1).
I believe we asked Erneux, and I think he said “this is for you to choose”.
Looking at it, to me it seems like a bit too much to give the power to three individuals on the Board to decide on exclusion, so unless I’m looking at the wrong version again, I would propose we make an amendment to this Article 9.7.
This is also how it is done in the Spiegel statute btw (see Article 4.3). To be noted that their article is much more elaborate though, with a couple of extra clauses to protect the group in case a Partner gets into financial troubles.
Edit: the discussion on the exclusion process is discussed in the thread on the SoSim board selection process - #17 by Sarah, posts 17 (Sarah) and 21 (myself))