I’ve added an option to include logo(s) - multiple ones along with the Edgeryders logo if needed.
The footer is now there, and there is an optional partners section - the example form includes all these.
Also the login text is now configurable, so theoretically you can change the entire form language - the only things that would stay in English are now the footer and the error messages.
@MariaEuler you mean where to publish them?
you modify this part of the configuration, as it describes here:
"publish": {
"topic": 14202
}
You can either put “topic” to specify the topic_id where you would like the answers to be posted in a single thread - or replace “topic” with “category” and put the id of the category you want the responses to be posted in.
In the latter case each answer will be posted as a separate topic in that category.
Here is an example where the responses will be posted in the campfire category (id 237):
"publish": {
"category": 237
}
Ah, ok I thought that needed to be the number if the specific post and needed to make it show up in the tell.edgeryders… thank you 
By popular demand I have added an option to display the contents of a separate topic (defined by the topic_id) inside the form - example here.
This creates a readable view of the topic, followed by the form fields below.
Documentation has been updated to reflect this.
Hei @owen does the form need to have a public topic in order to load?
I want the answers here to land to this: Registrations POPREBEL Food localisation 30 October 2020
But Edgeryders Forms doesn’t work when I put the topic name in the script…
No worries if not, it will be public after all, so maybe it doesn’t matter. Just wanted to be sure that the answers to the form don’t need to go to the page with the script, but can go to any platform topic you instruct them to!
Actually, forget it! I solved it 
Question for @owen and @MariaEuler: in the new account creation through the form, is the user taken through the original platform consent funnel? (for participating in research?) I suspect that is not the same as the consent for participating in webinars and online events,
Yes, it’s just the normal one for the platform. So you need to link the consent form in the last question. Will send example in a bit
add this as the last question:
{
“type”: “consent”,
“required”: true,
“text”: “The call will be recorded for research purposes. Please read details about that process in this information sheet and confirm that you understand and consent to the recording of the call. This is required to register and attend the call”,
“label”: “I agree”
},
Just with your particular form of the consent sheet linked
see how it shows below here:
https://tell.edgeryders.eu/14245
@noemi Will work on a better consent feature to display it as a popover inside the form, until then an external link is the solution.
@owen, there is no pressure at all on this request, but I was wondering how these forms could be used in other edgeryders affiliated forums such as Blivande (https://forum.blivande.com/). Might be interesting down the line when we are organising regular workshop events at blivande for example. But we can absolutely also use something else.
Asking just in case it only means to copy in a different line. Otherwise just ignore this 
Hey @MariaEuler - it’s possible, but it will require a bit of configuration on the admin side of the platform:
It’s not a huge amount of work, but it would require opening a dialogue with the platform administrator to set it up.
Ok, thank you. That is good to know. Will discuss with Blivande if it might be worth it at some point or if we cover elsewise.
We definitely need to do this. I’m administering the Blivande forum, so I can do it.
@owen, do we need our own branch or can we somehow use https://tell.edgeryders.eu but have it post on Blivande? If not, just point me to the right repo and what variables I need to change, and I can deploy with Netlify.
Hi Hugi - the repository is here: GitHub - edgeryders/tell
Ok this will require quite a bit of configuration:
multisite_account.json API endpoint, with the plugin James built“Allowed user api auth redirects” is enabled in the Admin and configure the redirect URL to return to after the user has logged in. This should be the domain of the form site + ‘/auth_redirect’. So tell.edgeryders.eu/auth_redirect in our case.VUE_APP_DISCOURSE_DOMAIN=edgeryders.eu
VUE_APP_REDIRECT_URL=Edgeryders Forms
VUE_APP_PRIVATE_KEY= generate a private RSA key and include it here.
VUE_APP_DISCOURSE_USER_URL=https://communities.edgeryders.eu/multisite_account.json
VUE_APP_DISCOURSE_AUTH_KEY= auth key created by admin
VUE_APP_DISCOURSE_TOPIC_URL=https://edgeryders.eu/posts.json
There are some more instances where the code to post a topic is hardcoded to edgeryders.eu, I’ll have to update this to rely only on the .env variables - until then do a search and replace on any ‘edgeryders.eu’ strings inside src/App.vue to point the requests to the Blivande platform.
@MariaEuler, @owen - we can now confirm that the new forms work properly for the communities sites.
We have just launched https://tell.blivande.com/
@MariaEuler, feel free now to use this for the course!
beautiful
@owen, is there a good way to contact everyone who filled out the form & commented on the topic to send out the reminders and zoom links?
we can not drop them in the public topic. Sending PMs by hand takes long and is error prone if done by hand and often the PMs are not getting read by those who do not regularly check the platform. Looking up the email for everyone who registered takes even longer.
How can we reach out to participants best if we use the forms to sign up for events (taking in consideration that we also need to address those who comment to the event threads directly not just through the form).
Any thoughts?
Would there be a possibility to adjust the email that is sent to people when using the forms to include an event registration line and a zoom link that is individual to each form? Or would that only get more confusing in setting up + make it necessary to set up the zoom links already very early?
Or could we possible to get a list “by form” with everyone’s username and email address who filled it out to be sent in a locked place while still sending the comments in the public posts?
@bojanbobic and @IvanC are also interested in this.