So, we have 12k in addition to the 8k I have already. @alberto, this is also how you understand it?
That ofc changes things, because it means I am covered while we still have more than enough for OuestWare if we can move it to OGS.
Sorry about the signature @marina, I suck. In my defense I donât think there was any paper or note with my name on it, but if there was and I missed that too, I suck even more.
hehe no, it was in the drawer, I didnât know you were coming after allâŚanyways, weâll figure it out 
1 Like
So, @marina and @alberto - I take it I can continue the conversation with OuestWare and schedule their time this fall?
We still didnât get the confirmation from the UCL thatâs the main problem I think. This is why many things are on standby. Iâll check if they have any news.
1 Like
Yes.
We donât have confirmation of the 12K, but we do have confirmation of the 8K. That was just a reallocation of our own internal budget, UCL not involved.
1 Like
this is already in Hugiâs contract
@hugi the answer we got from Jan is that they will definitely finance a solid portion, perhaps all we have requested. So formally, no approval yet, but @alberto do you think Hugi can go ahead anyway?
No, I am not comfortable with this. It shifts all the risks onto Edgeryders. We can only proceed with an âexit clauseâ.
Fresh in from Jan: we can count on 40K direct costs at least. âprobably something more, but no more than 45Kâ. Letâs re-prioritize ASAP, @marina @ivan.
2 Likes
That is 40k + eventual expenses by UCL for selected providers, or 40k fullstop?
Donât know yet, but asked the question to Jan.
1 Like
40K full stop.
Ok, we can discuss i pani and i pesci on Monday in the office with Marina present.
I will prepare the numbers concerning WP7.
Letâs start by disentangling the Graphryderâs situation.
@hugi has:
- A contract to end in June 2022 funded with 5K to him, of which only 2.5K were spent.
- An addendum of 3K (again, to Hugi personally) for 2022, completely unspent.
So, we can confirm that a budget of 5K (actually 5.5K) is already available to cover Hugiâs work.
Additionally, we have 6K in other goods and services, allocated to Ouestware (pending Hugiâs say-so).
From the new amendment, we take 4K EUR. The total amounts to 5 K EUR for Hugi, plus 10K EUR for the third-party developer, which completely funds these activities off development of Graphryder.
For the rest, we are going to
- let go of the extra 20K of communication (OGS), which we donât try to replace.
- reduce substantially the extra effort on dissemination and data analysis. What is left, I am going to claim myself.
- defend project management and the extra staff budget on communication (for the impact conference).
The new breakdown is:
| Activity | Type | PM | Budget (direct) | Budget (total) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data analysis, supplement | staff | 1 | 6000 | 7500 |
| Dissemination: writing and presenting | staff | 1.5 | 9000 | 11250 |
| Tech support: improving Graphryder | OGS | 4000 | 5000 | |
| Project management | staff | 1.5 | 9000 | 11250 |
| Communication | staff | 2 | 12000 | 15000 |
| Total | 6 | 40000 | 50000 |
3 Likes
Understood! This completely covers my project management, documentation and training for Graphryder until the end of 2022.
I have already opened the discussion with Ouestware, and they are ready to go. Once I get the green light I will have them go through procurement. Do I have the green light?
Yes.
We had to change this slightly, so just as an info to others, this is the final version:
I am fresh from todayâs team leaders meeting. It turns out that, after going through the numbers, UCL has 40K extra direct costs total earmarked for going to other partners, not just to fund our activities. This is after funding the salaries of the ethnographers. The latter are funded with some leftover UCL money that is set to stay in UCL.
Bottom line is, the discussion we had with @marina and @ivan above was premature, and even a bit useless. In the meeting, people presented what they wanted to do if they had some extra money. I explained once again what we ourselves would do. At the end of the day Jan will make a decision, and we will accept it. Since money (that, six months ago, looked abundant) is now once again scarce, then UCL will, rightly, take a more proactive approach towards allocating this money: at the end of the day, this is his budget and his decision. At this time, Jan thinks we should invest in communicating more towards non-academic audiences. Will write a new update as he circulates a table with a proposed reallocation.
wow ok. so the phrase from one of Janâs last e-mails âwe are going to be able to put in the revised budget NO LESS THAN 50k (including indirect costs) for Edgerydersâ is completely incorrect.