A small problem with categories for protected interviews

[alberto]

@Jan

We definitely want to keep the three language communities separate (for comparisons).

@Maniamana

I think it’s a great idea to move the topics to protected categories in respective languages! Let’s see what others think.

Ok, so my proposal:

@alberto

I found more protected categories. […] Is the latter really necessary? Would it be acceptable to move the topics therein to the protected categories of the relative language?

For this problem, I propose to move the 4 topics currently in the “Protected ethnographic data” cat into the protected language-appropriate category, and then delete the Protected ethnographic data" category itself.

@alberto

I see @rebelethno have been coding themselves, or each other. Example: The Code Review Thread.

For this, I can make a more intelligent proposal when I understand the role of this coding activity in POPREBEL. Can anyone help me understand?