I have started a document with all the pros and cons of both type of heat pumps (TB/avant projet/Heat pumps)
I don’t know if you have seen this, but the IBGE facilitator had already given some pros and cons of the system => you can find this back in the mail exchange (proton mailbox, folder IBGE): replys of March 20 th and March 26th
I’ve contacted the facilitator again last night, asking more about possible pros and cons…
@Lee : if you would be contacting the architects tomorrow, could you ask them a question concerning this topic?
I would like to know the space they occupy
I guess for the geothermal one, there is 0 m2 required in the apartment (but space required in the common technical room).
How much space is needed in the common technical room for the geothermal heat pump: a full 20 m2?
How much space (m2) needed in the technical space of the apartment, in the case of air source heat pump?
To double check: does the geothermal one needs space on the roof (or in the garden)? Online I read that no space on the roof is needed , i the comparaison table of Walk i see there is some space needed
I integrated this in the document with pro’s and cons, but I don’t understand some things.
@Lee : feel free to modify and/or change the layout… I have tried to look up the life cycle cost via chatGPT but it gives contradictory information with the other info…
I have created a 2-page summary note to explain the highlights and to look at the financial aspects.
Saved in Team Building > Avant-projet > Heat pumps: Login – Nextcloud
Overall, even when taking into account increasing electricity prices, it doesn’t look super good (though certainly better than the 137 years ).
The key point on which I’d like to get feedback at the plenary tomorrow is the last part, on exploring the options to finance it on a voluntary basis. If there is not much enthusiasm for that, we should probably close the issue.
hi, based on what I learned from the meeting this morning. I asked Google Gemini (Advanced with Deep Seek Pro 2.5) to produce a report, using the following prompt.
|-|Apartment complex with 22 living units in three separate buildings|
|-|A typical apartment would have 2 people living there.|
|-|There are a few communal spaces, taking upon the space of 3 apartments
|-|The three roofs are covered by a total of 50 solar average size solar panels|
|-|In Brussels, Belgium|
|-|A battery will be installed
|-|About 7 apartments run the risk of overheating in the summer|
|-|Newly built passive housing (to be delivered in 2028)|
|-|Inside temp to be kept between 20 and 24 celsius|
|-|What would be the optimal battery capacity?|
|-|What are the pros and cons of ASHP or GSHP| [A=air G=geo sourced heat pump]
|-|After how many years would the GSHP investment offer a return?|
|-|How do the different choices affect the energy independence|
Here’s the 30-page report, citing 70 sources.
Of course, I have some of the numbers in the prompt wrong, but this is easily corrected by running the prompt again. We could add other items to the prompt.
Even if the report contains inaccuracies (and I cannot tell), it will help in conducting a conversation with the technical experts.
@els and @joannes I saved the meeting notes in the document with meeting notes with the architects (Login – Nextcloud). Feel free to add your own notes and corrections.
I inserted some small comments and corrections. Feel free to do what it as you see fit.
As a general observation: even without numbers, I will most likely not sign up as an investor for such an Energy Performance Contract (EPC) with Shared Savings.
So if you agree I’m going to add a second proposal, in which everybody chooses the heat pump system of their choice.
All in all I’m afraid however that it is just not possible, and that it may be preferable to save our resources to possibly set up an EPC for a battery in the future. Let’s see.