Oh, I can double-check it myself as well. It was just about making sure that discrimination doesn’t contain any pop-rebel annotations.
That is what it looks like to me too.
1 Like
The problem remains. Consider:
Clicking on Show in topic
yields:
If you destroy the annotation, you remove not only test_code_1
, but the whole annotation, and therefore you affect the other two codes in the same annotation.
Sorry, @wojt, but going fast is not the way, It is how we ended up with stuff that did not belong in the ICQE22 paper: just bulk add the code to the whole category of interview transcriptions, and that led us astray.
This turns out to be wrong, I tested it with @Wojt. If an ethnographer highlights a snippet and adds two codes to it, Open Ethnographers creates two annotation objects in the database, which are identical except for their ID and the code itself.