Finishing touches before we open: format conventions and onboarding funnel

I declare incompetence here – was not thinking about gamification and badge-earning. You guys decide, or, if you want a second opinion, we can evoke @matteo_uguzzoni, our resident game designer.

I was thinking of creating a little narrative whereby contributors can place themselves easily. “I am a data scientist looking at CO2 emissions, therefore I am an augur. Let me look at my recommended tasks list…”

This is another critical point: we should have a landing page saying clearly what we are looking for. I would say:

  1. Introduce oneself topics. Helps to get a grip on what skills people have.
  2. Witnesspedia entry edits. Self-explanatory
  3. Comments to Witnesspedia entries. Debate on the entries themselves.
  4. Proposed new entries. Distrikt proposals, and entries on things other than districts. Currencies might become a big deal.
  5. Non-text contributions. Illustrations, videos, music, data visualizations, fictional economics papers, whatever.

Should we already encourage people to write fiction, too? Or is too early?