Sure, but... any guidelines? Last year's report ended up being pretty ugly. I chose an abridged format, based on bullet points. Marco, at the opposite end of the spectrum, went for a more discursive style, and even posted pictures. What do we do this year? Same thing again?
On a different note, I had volunteered to write Section 1.1 of Tech report part A. It is now ready. Please everyone, if you want changes made use the "Suggesting" mode, rather than ask me to change things around.