@Lee
question to the architects:
" Vous avez indiqué qu’à ce moment on ne doit pas exactement savoir combien unités vont pour option 1 et combine unités vont pour option 2. => est-ce que ce n’est pas possible de dire qu’on va pour les deux options (et on ne sait pas à ce moment combien de personnes vont pour l’option 1 et combien pour l’option 2). Si jamais au moment d’appel d’offre on constate que personne va pour l’option 1, peut-etre ca nous coutera un peu plus chère au niveau des devis des études techniques, mais est-ce que ca posera vraiement un problème/autre problème qu’un petit surplus un coût?? Si oui, pouvez vous expliquer le problème?"
Answer: “Nous allons écrire aux bureaux d’études pour leur préciser cela et demander qu’ils adaptent leurs devis.”
I called francois friday morning to be absolutely sure if I understood this well. So they are going to tackle the ‘issue’ differently: They are going to ask the bureau d’études to give price offers for the different options. The lign was not so great but i clearly understood they are not blocked any more right now, and our decision ‘option1/option 2’ can wait. I will come back to this point on Wednesday when i see them, but for me this decision is not prior any more.
In light of the discussion with the notary, i think we need to figure out certain things (in the coming months)…
- if option 1 goes forward, how will the accounting be handled => @reef-finance can you take this up
- blueprint vs advise notary => @reef-building : as alberto mentionned, maybe good if we consult Mark on this one. You (lee) are the keyholder, how do you propose to handle this (can we contact them asking for a meeting?)
When i had them on the phone on Friday, i asked for an update of the planning by Wednesday when i’ll see them
right now, no decision needed any more. The way i understood it, we will have till the phase of the ‘Dossier de demande de primes’. (but will ask confirmation of that on Wednesday)