Learning to Live: THE FIRST EDGEYRDERS COMMUNITY PAPER!

Ok so the first Edgeryders Community Paper is online!!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/104169463/Edgeryders-Community-Paper-Learning-To-Live

Why does this matter. Because it goes to show that:

  1. with relatively little effort a large number of us can contribute towards producing something of value to others and to ourselves in policy contexts.

  2. It highlights one of the challenges of doing this where money is involved. This was a paid gig, I was originally offered 500 Euros to do the work but it would have felt weird to accept it. I accepted the contract and signed it in my name because the administrative mess of producing a large number of contracts to split 500 euros is just not feasible. Now I don’t know what do do with the money, stick it into an Edgeryders paypal account or something…any ideas?

So here is the background and a little about the process…

A while ago I was approached by someone from the Council of Europe asking whether we could contribute to a report they were producing in repsonse to this Parliamentary Assembly Motion about the need to come up with responded to increasing rates of self harm amongst young people in Europe: http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc10/EDOC12256.pdf

So I set up a mission report about it here: http://edgeryders.ppa.coe.int/where-edgeryders-dare/mission_case/edge-learning

We tweeted about it both through my own and the oficial Edgeryders account.

People started having discussions in the comments. Then Ksenia set up a google doc and more of us started contributing here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LqX1mHnwvSpXwwl7akjdOxTDOqm9sOyNVsFESxyEAR8/edit

I thought it would be nice to get more input from the internets and asked people to help get together a list of initaitives, places, projects and approaches that seem to be helping get at the underlying causes: http://pad.telecomix.org/fasjubef

Where are the contents going?

They are being included as a contribution draft report to be submitted to the committee by the “Rapporteur” (Ms.) Elvira Kovacs through one of her colleagues, Angela Garabagiu (see email below). But they could just as easily serve as a starting point for more discussions or be used by individual participants as a point of reference in figuring out how their projects relate to each other. But more than anything they are I would argue a useful excercise for our own thinking. How do we know what we do makes sense? How do we connect it with what others are doing? How do we make it easier for others to find us and contribute to what we are trying to achieve? These are challenges many of us are facing in our individual efforts…

And the response:

"GARABAGIU Angela

11:59 AM (3 hours ago)

to me, EL-IMAM

Dear Nadia,

Thank you very much for having sent your conclusions. Great timing! I really appreciate.

I did not receive a copy of the contract. If you have a copy, could you scan it and send it by e-mail? The original should reach us by post.

I will start incorporating your proposals into the main report. I really appreciate the work put into gathering the replies and contributions from you members. Thanks to all those who took part.

Kind regards,

Angela"

Amazing, but needs context

Nadia, Ksenia and all, congratulations! This is absolutely amazing.

One modest proposal: I suggest you take a little more time to explain how the document is contributing to the policy making process. The natural place to do it is the “About this paper” section in the document on Scribd. The interesting part of the story is that this is an external agent asking for the community’s advice: the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, as opposed to the Social Cohesion Research and Early Warning Division. It is a strong sign that the community has been able to convey credible, even authoritative advice in a very structured policy process, so much that it has been recruited into a second one. And this is pretty amazing, if you think how blissfully unstructured Edgeryders is…

Ok will add it into the revised edition

Thnks for feedback.

Well done

I agree with Alebrto, I find the paper inspiring, loaded with fresh perspective on contemporary youth issues, which policy makers actually need! What could be added is this “sharper edge”. Congratulations anyway!!