During today’s call @johncoate , @Natalia_Skoczylas , @phm and I had the first real project co-design session. A summary of what was discussed [please add what I have missed]:
- We discussed three cases:
- The Diabetes implant: What was an illegal hack in 2012, is now a solution that is available for others. How did this happen? What kind of legal hoops did they have to jump through?
- Im many EU countries the welfare infrastructure was designed for populations with planned groth. With more refugees arriving you both have an increase in number of people to care for, and different kinds of needs which is being framed as the source of " chaos in the system". Perhaps it would make sense to look at how health- and social care is being managed both in the camps and temporary receoption centres, as well as in the mainstream healthcare providers.
- Is there a distincting between the NHS overall (long term) and the temporary refugee situation: Is it just a question of money, or are/were there some things that can be improved? How does a clinic in Brixton cope with a situation in which you have five hundred people who have just walked to Calais and have broken feet? In addition to the Epidemological situation.
- We need raw data about how the healthcare situation is currently being managed, but from first hand sources...ie go out and ask people on the ground. How many doctors, nurses and others are currently active in caring for the new arrivals? Where are the resources coming from, is it mainly charities? Is this information already out there and is anyone aggregating information about the different intiatives providing care services to people?
Some early “conclusions”:
- When it comes to DIY solutions to health- and social care problems, there is a key tension between asking for permission and asking for forgiveness. Who/how can and should we convene around finding legal/administrative hacks for existing DIY solutions to health- and social care problems?
- An obvious path towards achieiving impact is to find, acknowledge and draw support towards people who already are doing important work. This has to happen online on the edgeryders.eu platform in order for us to fullfull our obligations and to stay true to our mission. Does it make sense to run the project in 3-month cycles consisting of the following steps?
- People reach out to little known but promising initiatives and ask them about their work and post the documentation on platform where we can help edit them into really compelling stories. These stories are designed as informative case studies with a specific call for action from the broader community.
- We share their stories online and engage the internet in making sense of the challenges they face, as well as identifying fixes/hacks/solutions/new projects. Part of this is sharing specifications, doing requirements engineering and the necessary background research to determine viability of different proposals.
- We build a number of small, focused events in which people existing intiatives with designing and build the identified fixes/hacks/solutions and projects. Kind of like the workshop on Collaborative Inclusion...but taking place over a couple of days, in a hacker or makerspace, where you leave having built something that works. Two projects to begin with: BBC Frontline Documentary on Two UK Doctors Helping Refugees | Dutch Volunteer Turns Refugee Boats and Life Jackets Into Backpacks .
- BBC Frontline Documentary on Two UK Doctors Helping Refugees - See more at: https://edgeryders.eu/en/opencare/bbc-frontline-documentary-on-two-uk-doctors-helping-refugees#comment-21988
- BBC Frontline Documentary on Two UK Doctors Helping Refugees - See more at: https://edgeryders.eu/en/opencare/bbc-frontline-documentary-on-two-uk-doctors-helping-refugees#comment-21988