Organizing ‘what’ and leading ‘whom’ in ‘empty spaces’?

So much empty spaces!

I enjoyed the long-form writing, introducing the reader to so many details of post-quake social life in Nepal. Some of them I know from experience myself. Including the discovery of being insensitive towards people whose minds suffer from present and future aftershocks …

So leadership is the activity of filling empty spaces with beautiful structure? I like that definition. So in more prosaic form, it’s seeing the opportunity to do something good, and doing it? And yes, there are ample opportunities within ourselves, and nobody can be a leader who has not gathered experience in working there. Here I agree. But then, there are also ample opportunities in the external world, also beyond the family and neighborhood. As much as I’d love leaderless movements (which are movements with everyone being a leader) to be able to take these on, as little I’ve seen this happening … . For more reflections on this topic, there is my recent acticle on movement  building (and the discussion starting from there).