Instructions for this wiki
Please add your presentation(s) to the steering committee meeting of Wednesday, November 30th. Please focus on the project’s objectives (see below), not on the project management aspects – we have the reporting to take care of that. Tell us:
- What have you been working on since Stockholm?
- How does it contribute to the project's objectives?
- What do you need from other partners to continute your journey?
- [...]
A good time would be 10 minutes per presentation, with the possibility that partners and/or WPs combine two presentations, let’s say. Take one slot for each major thing you have been working on. The idea is to leave enough room for discussion.
WeMake, as hosting partner, has last word on sequencing and the final agenda.
List of the presentations
I (Guy) suggest that we order presentations according to the WPs, to put ourselves into a mid-term reporting mindset. WP leaders should edit the wiki and add title, presenters’ names, upload slides, etc.
- Go back to the DoA, link your presentation with the WP's listed objectives and address them.
opencare's objectives (from the proposal)
Objective 1. Learn-by-doing how to deploy collective intelligence to design care services
1.1. Develop a how-to guide to convene, manage and harvest a large-scale online conversation as a care provision service design engine. The guide should be a result of learning-by-doing, building on previous experience and improving on it.
1.2. Develop a how-to guide to document testing activities in the field or in the lab/makerspace in such a way that documentation can be fed back to the online conversation. The guide should be a result of learning-by-doing, building on previous experience and improving on it.
Objective 2. Produce a realistic scenario of policy for community-driven provision of care services at scale
2.1. Consider the implications of applying community-driven design and delivery of care services to the context of European welfare states. Give special attention to the issue of fairness and ownership of the input contributed to open processes.
2.2. Identify best practice in community welfare, and in general care services designed and/or delivered through collectively intelligent processes, and learn from them.
Objective 3. Assemble a software stack to monitor and assist collective intelligence social dynamics in online communities
3.1 Further test, validate and if necessary extend OpenEthnographer in the context of the conversation on care (see section 1.3.5)
3.1 Further test, validate and if necessary extend Edgesense in the context of the conversation on care (see section 1.3.5)
3.3 Build and test a prototype of a tool for semantic network analysis (see 1.4.2)
ethics, data management plan and budget
- If relevant, address how your work involves the ethics work package and/or the data management plan, what has been or still needs to be done.
- You should also say a word about budget consumption -- everything going as planned, some actions started later than planned and budget not all consummed, etc.
presentations
WP1 (SCIMPULSE) - Learn, engage and disseminate
- Lorep Ipsum
WP2 (ER) -
- @Noemi – Engaging, onboarding and managing the opencare online community. Includes an account of the Open&Change operation. (10 min.)
- @Alberto (with @Amelia ). Ethnographic coding: how it is going, its methodological challenges. (10 min.)
WP3 (WeMake) - Prototype community-driven care services
- Lorep Ipsum
WP4 (EHFF) - Design and evaluation of community-based health/social policies at scale
Brief Powerpoint on on cases, policy evaluation and design of survey
WP5 (UBx) - Data processing for aggregating collective intelligence processes
- @melancon Prototyping the SSNA dashboard / Supporting ethno-coding (2 x 10 min.)
WP6 (UBx) - Lead, govern and manage the project
- @Luce Gettin' ready for the mid-term report (10 min.)
CIty of MIlano might also want to report on their activities, please feel free to add a prez.