Are we 100% sure about that? I’m looking at the two different versions of the planning (Login – Nextcloud), and it seems to me that there is a scenario in which we start the call for tenders right after the introduction of the building permit (see column BE, line 101). I imagine that this is a risk that we would need to decide on as a group, but if the decision would be “let’s go”, it would require more capital to pay the architects.
I think I will follow up on this with Mark, and use the opportunity to ask a couple more questions about the planning, including:
Acte de base: when do we sign it and when do we need to start preparing it?
Mortgages: when do we sign them, and what do we need for it?
Reservation document: when do we need it?
Pros and cons of starting the call for tenders right after the introduction of the permit.
When to organise the next meeting with the neighbours.
I realise I’m off topic here, so feel free to zap this to a separate thread. I just don’t want to assume that we have all the time of the world to recruit more households.
Another argument (also valid I believe in the case of Oak Tree not coming through), is that we will need another round of notarial deeds, because a certain percentage of the site can’t be sold to the final owners.
Well spotted, indeed. Also, we have received that invoice by now, and its value is slightly lower for some reason. I guess they are still working with a slightly lower estimate of the price of construction.
I made an attempt at making a file that presents the key milestones of our planning plus the corresponding cash requirements in one file that is easy to read (also for number-blind people like me).
I saved it in Team Finance > Estimations and scenarios > Financial needs forecast: Login – Nextcloud
Could you please have a look and make any corrections where necessary?