Just wanted to double check something. On the thread for how we go from scouting to purchasing a site (From scouting to purchasing a site: the process step-by-step), it says that 3 weeks after a feasibility study is presented there will be a vote on whether or not to buy:
5. Presentation of the feasibility studies at a plenary meeting
- Team Building will present the feasibility studies that have been completed at a plenary meeting. The links to these studies should be in the draft agenda 3 days ahead of the meeting at the latest.
- The sites that have been presented will then be scheduled for a vote at the next plenary meeting, 3 weeks later. This means that Full Members have 3 weeks to learn more about the site to inform their vote.
But we don’t actually have feasibility studies for the two sites on the agenda for tomorrow, just a report on how the feasibility study is progressing. They aren’t yet ready to provide things like drawings or price estimates per square metre, which are fairly significant to the decision-making process.
So am I right in thinking that the discussion about the two sites tomorrow is a preliminary one, rather than the beginning of a 3-week countdown to a decision?