Hi Richard, it should be possible through the user setting. If you send me their account ID here on ER, I can try to do it.
Me. Let me know her username, I can fix it.
It worked!
1 Like
Are there links to the spreadsheets of the final three Z categories?
PS: I’m examining a PhD this afternoon at 14.00, so won’t be able to join you. But I’ll try and look at the outstanding codes.
cannot find the link for Ideologies… can you share it here please?
1 Like
Dear All, I have set up our weekly meetings on Rutgers Zoom: Here is the invite: Jan Kubik is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: Coding
Time: Jan 21, 2022 09:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Every week on Fri, until Jun 24, 2022, 23 occurrence(s)
Jan 21, 2022 09:00 AM
Jan 28, 2022 09:00 AM
Feb 4, 2022 09:00 AM
Feb 11, 2022 09:00 AM
Feb 18, 2022 09:00 AM
Feb 25, 2022 09:00 AM
Mar 4, 2022 09:00 AM
Mar 11, 2022 09:00 AM
Mar 18, 2022 09:00 AM
Mar 25, 2022 09:00 AM
Apr 1, 2022 09:00 AM
Apr 8, 2022 09:00 AM
Apr 15, 2022 09:00 AM
Apr 22, 2022 09:00 AM
Apr 29, 2022 09:00 AM
May 6, 2022 09:00 AM
May 13, 2022 09:00 AM
May 20, 2022 09:00 AM
May 27, 2022 09:00 AM
Jun 3, 2022 09:00 AM
Jun 10, 2022 09:00 AM
Jun 17, 2022 09:00 AM
Jun 24, 2022 09:00 AM
Please download and import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to your calendar system.
Weekly: Error - Zoom
Join Zoom Meeting
Join by SIP
99639254165@zoomcrc.com
Meeting ID: 996 3925 4165
Password: 330735
One tap mobile
+13126266799,99639254165# US (Chicago)
+16465588656,99639254165# US (New York)
Join By Phone
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
Meeting ID: 996 3925 4165
Find your local number: https://rutgers.zoom.us/u/acIdCbjALf
Join by Skype for Business
If you have any questions, please contact the Office of Information Technology Help Desk
Hi @rebelethno
Here’s a link to a spreadsheet Poland - Czech Interviews - Google Tabellen Mania and I put together. In the Analytics sheet, we started noting down potential topics that we could start incorporating into our interviews.
Feel free to add your ideas and it would be nice if we could briefly discuss this during the meeting this Friday. 
2 Likes
Dear all, I am afraid I am not managing to join our meeting today. Hope I will catch up next week
Hi guys, are we meeting today?
@Wojt and @Jan I found out why approaches to social change is included in POPREBEL. It is because one of its children has this annotation on the POPREBEL International corpus.
So, in this case, no bug, but an annoying lack of clear separation between different projects. This will be fixed by the next rollout.
I also discussed the issues you reported with @matthias , did some testing and reported them on GitHub as per his advice: one, two.
Hi @rebelethno,
Here is the list of themes we put together when we started working for POPREBEL → POPREBEL Fieldwork Thread - #18 by Maniamana. Looking back at it now it’s pretty extensive and covers a lot of relevant topics - I rarely cover all of them during my interviews.
It therefore might be just a question of revisiting them, highlighting ones that we should be focusing on from now on and maybe adding some of the more current topics as we started putting together here: Poland - Czech Interviews - Google Tabellen.
Unfortunately I won’t be able to join this Friday’s meeting, but if someone takes minutes, I’ll look at them later. The main question for me is whether we should keep the COVID / health emphasis going forward.
I have an answer for @Wojt and @Jan about the annotations that “make no sense”. It turns out to be a known issue. After coding the post, @Maniamana edited the post, adding a paragraph to its beginning (the new paragraph contains information on the informant). Open Ethnographer records annotations based on the paragraph, so when the numbering of paragraphs was altered (inserting a new paragraph 1 turned the old paragraph 1 into paragraph 2, and so on) the rendering of the paragraph was corrupted.
We are looking for a more robust solution, but for now I can state that this will not happen, unless you edit the post after coding. You can still add paragraphs at the end of the post without consequences, but anywhere else is at risk. Even better would be to add any additional information as a separate post in the same thread, hitting the Reply button.
The annotation you mentioned was created on April 20, '21 but on May 20, '21 a paragraph was added to the start of the annotated post. As annotations are anchored to paragraphs, this messed up all annotations in the post. Internally the annotations are still present, but annotator is now unable to display them properly. When the beginning of a long post is edited is basically the worst case (and happens rarely) as it messes up all annotations after the edited paragraph.
3 Likes
Ok, we will!
Good afternoon/Good morning team! Where are we meeting today?
try this
1 Like