Not sure if this is for the Wednesday meeting or for the next Friday ethnographers meeting but I wanted to make note of the discussions I had with @Jan and @alberto about the timeline for POPREBEL going forward, and potentially capping the interviews obtained to-date at February 24th, so they are “time-stamped” organically by the beginning of the war with Ukraine, since it is such a crucial event with reverberations for the region under study that it seems to me it would be better to sequester “clean” data before people’s ideas and emotions about nationalism-adjacent topics are influenced by it. (For instance, just speculating, there might be an uptick in positive pro-nationalist sentiment from people who normally would be critical of it because of sympathy towards Ukraine’s sovereignty being violated in brutal ways – of course that is important to know, but it seems more methodologically rigorous to examine that data separately from pre-war data).
At the same time, if we were to proceed with an additional layer of ethnographic research, it could be focused on understanding sentiments specifically in the context of the war, and could be done through interviews done in the Rapid Ethnographic Assessment framework, designed to collect ethnographic information quickly in the context of an emerging or unfolding crisis. All countries in the study are accepting massive influxes of refugees, so it certainly meets the qualifications. I have some ideas for the format that interviews could take in that context (semi-structured interviews incorporating a “grand tour interview” opening and perhaps also incorporating a word completion component) – happy to talk more about that if we decide we move forward with this.