Ok – could the Polish and the Czech groups provide the updates lists for Alberto to do on Monday, then?
@Jan and I have drafted a section explaining the “four principles” we discussed in the meeting on Friday that immediately precedes and will help frame the three ethnographic “country” sections which will contain these visualizations.
Yes, please, and Monday morning if that’s at all possible.
Alright.
Regarding Polish vis and 5 pillars - what I requested stands, hence my previous post asking for updated visualizations is still valid;)
In addition, could I please have those visualizations:
Retraditionalisation
Trust/distrust
Thanks a lot!!
Apologies, only managed to get to this now - please find the codes fitted into the 5 pillars below:
Are we talking of d or b?
These two codes stay both in the network until d >= 9. Above that, invoking history disappears first. At d >= 7, it looks like this:
All these edges are underwritten by the interviews of at least 4 informants, and up to 21. Remember orange edges signify associations made by mostly female informants; green onles, by mostly male ones.
d >= 9:
d >= 3:
Not very dense, but still quite large, with 82 codes and 124 edges.
b >= 3 is little better: 74 codes, 110 edges.
distrust was not used as all in this corpus. You have mistrust (above I suggested that these two might be worth merging). Both mistrust and alienation have only edges of depth 1, so they are dropped by even the mildest reduction. Of the other three codes, protests resists to a reduction of up to d >= 12, Eeconcor up to d >= 17, and DDpolcor up to d >= 36. This is what happens at d >= 8 (below). Edges have b between 2 and 17 (the broadest co-occurrence is between DDpolcor and Andrej Babiš).
There is no code called neocolonialism, but there is one called GLOBneocol. Hopefully it’s the one.
These codes together resist up to d >= 3. At 4, we lose anti-candidate voting. At 5, we lose GLOBneocol. At 30, DDeliteestrangement, with `SIincompetence resisting up to 45. Situation at d >0 3:
Quite messy, and many edges with breadth = 1. Try this, for b >= 3:
victims of post-socialist transformation only has super shallow edges (d = b = 1). At d >= 3, protest voting disappears. Ad d >= 9, civil disobedience disappears. At *d* >= 12, only protests`remains, and it disappears at 13. This is what happens at b >= 2:
b >= 2
anxiety, hate and hopelessness have no edges with b = 2 or more. The other three codes are visualized below for b >= 2:
The Retraditionalisation, Polarisation and Trust/Distrust visualisations are interesting; I’ll write up my interpretation of these themes over the weekend. @alberto, should I go ahead and merge mistrust and distrust?
It’s interesting how my intuitive assumption about the relationship between Anger + Emotionally Difficult + Unfair isn’t reflected in the visualisation. It acts as a useful corrective.
I have to attend an Exam Board tomorrow (Friday) at 14.00 UK, so I’ll have to miss the meeting. Please let me know if there is any additional homework.
LOL
Yes, unless they mean different things.
@Richard please be sure and include that in your interpretations! That’s exactly the kind of thing that can illustrate what this mixed-methods iterative model has to offer.
@Richard did you get a chance to write up your interpretations over the weekend?
Can everyone else in @rebelethno working on reconciling ethnographic sections and visualizations please update me on where you are at and where you expect to be by Friday?
Hi Nica, I am planning to be finished today:)
Hello Veronica. We had meeting of the Czechnography group yesterday. We have selected the graps to put in the text and started to write interpretations. @Jirka_Kocian is the main author from our side. I have not been present till the end of the meeting but I assume we will use 3 graphs to each of the parts @jitka.kralova highlighted. I also assume we might be able to finish by Friday this week.
One more visualizations of abortion + Catholic Church for @Maniamana:
b >= 3, very similar to d >= 3
Thank you so much, looks great!!
Hi @Nica
Just to let you know that I have incorporated the visualisations and text into the main document.
I doubt it, but will have a look and revert.
No, this particular visualization is identical. distrust will now have a higher connectivity in the main stacked graph, but mistrust had not been used nearly as much, so the overall picture is unlikely to change much.
