Emerging digital spaces of possibilities - ABSTRACT DRAFT2
@Federico Monaco, @Noemi and all,
(1) Federico, I agree with, and like, what you wrOte. In particular, I like the notion of “materializing”, to be paralleled to the one of “infrastructuring”. Is the this term (“materializing”), used with this meaning in this context, based on some theoretical background ?
I also like the title of your post: Emerging digital space of possibilities.
Are you proposing it as the title of the paper? (my original one was Infrastructuring spaces of possibilities.)
Maybe we could use the one you propose with a subtitle as:
“From on-line conversations to on-site collaborations. The OpenCare case”.
(2) Beyond this, I re-propose you a question already raised in my last post:
- Having a digital space of possibility, what could be the most general term to name everything happens in it?
Until now I referred to “events” (as the most general term) and “conversations” (as the core of what we will consider in this discussion. In the OpenCare website, when somebody upload a case, this is called a “story”: is this a term usable by us, with some theoretical background? Other times other terms are used, as texts, interactions, behaviours,
(3) Given the 2+1 hypotheses I proposed seem to be acceptable (in their spirit, at least) I prepared (here below) a working document ABSTRACT DRAFT2. What you will find is only the integration of my DRAFT1 proposal with the 2+1 hypotheses: nothing else, coming for the followed discussion, has been integrated yet: could you work on it?
In any case, in my view a main point is still missing, both in contents and formal terms:
- To make clear 2-3 main concepts on which the paper is built (at the moment we have: digital space of possibilities; conversations; infrastructuring; materializing ; … ) In my view, these main concepts must be not so many and, possibly, they should be grounded in a strong and recognizable (by RESET) theory.
- To give the sense and of the +1 hypothesis on the hacker approach opportunities
- To indicate the political meaning of what we are proposing
NB on length: at the moment, DRAFT2 , as it is now, is 521 words long. I think it should easy to cut/change it and free some spaces to add the other needed concepts.
DRAFT 2 - ABSTRACT (521 words – to bereduce to less than 500)
The article is based on the OpenCare first results. Where OpenCare is an on-going European research delivered by a consortium of universities and the grassroots hacker community.
OpneCare main goal is prototyping a community-driven model of addressing social and health care. It is based on three elements: advances in collective intelligence research, to lend coherence and summarize large-scale online debates; advances in digital fabrication and cheap-and-open hardware technology; and the rise of a global hacker community, willing and able to look for solutions to care problems. At this point of time, OpenCare is arrived at half of its journey: the prototype of care-oriented digital space is already working at the real scale; different kinds of conversations are taking place; in-depth observations on them, and on its overall functioning, can be done.
This article moves from these conversations-in-their-environment and discusses when and how an initial trigger (such as a post presenting an idea or a story) generates an online conversation that, in turn, may evolve and become – in our case- an in-situ care-related activity.
According to the OpenCare nature and intentions, these events are not directly generated and/or supported by the OpenCare team. Nevertheless, the way in which the digital space is organized, and the affordances that characterize it, play a role in when and how conversations start and evolve in collaborations (that, in turn, can, or cannot, move from the digital to the physical space).
These OpenCare research activities have been based on 3 main working hypotheses:
-
it is possible to create a (care-oriented) digital space of possibilities where different kinds of self-organized (care-oriented) conversations can emerge and evolve towards (care-oriented) conversations for action.
-
it is possible to embed in the digital space of possibilities some specific affordances, thanks to which (care-oriented) conversations have higher probabilities to emerge and evolve towards conversations for action.
- (the experiences in open systems and the hackers approach, considered in a radical way, offer innovative guidelines also when the care issue is concerned.
Given these hypotheses, and given the prototype of care-oriented space of possibilities OpenCare realized, the paper core research specific questions are: Are these hypotheses verified? What can we learn from the first months of experience?
To answer this question, OpenCare team observes how the realised full scale prototype od space of possibilities worked, considering: (1) the dynamic of the events (different kind of interactions and conversations) that are taking place and (2) the role of the space of possibilities and its affordance in making that dynamic happen.
The paper presents, some experiences of “doing together” (in the digital and in the physical space) and analyses and discusses the relationships between them and the digital environment affordances. In particular, the paper presents and discusses:
- different examples of conversation, using ethnographic tools to evaluate their original culture and motivations and the way they changed moving on in their beginning towards different kinds of “doing together”.
- different infrastructuring actions, done by the OpenCare team, in order to modify and up-grade the systems affordances
The article conclusions introduce some thread of research to be developed in the next months, inside the same OpenCare, and after its conclusion.