I thinks that’s fairly normal
Thanks for this, Florina. Actually, I think this is probably fairly typical. You tell children from a very young age that they are supposed to become adults with certain characteristics. You tell them “they must”, “it’s their duty”, because the seduction of money and power does not really work on young children, who don’t seem to be particularly interested in abstract things like net worth. Children generally want to be superheroes or circus artists, not investment bankers! So parents play the duty card. With time, most people internalize this duty as if it were their own wish. So, your colleague is stuck in a pretty illogical chain of thoughts:
- I want to be happy
- therefore, I take higher education
- so I can have a good income and afford a nice house
- which does not really make me happy, as I can be happy in a tiny apartment too.
- educaton leads to income
- income does not imply happiness
- by transitivity, education IS NOT MEANT to lead to happiness, at least not primarily,
My opinion
I think you are somewhat right, but I think that my colleague was pretty illogical there, because he kept on saying that money doesn’t bring happiness, although during the whole conversation he talked about a good income, a big house, to feel pleased&HAPPY. As for the reputation, I was quite appalled… I mean…are there really any prople who study just to be recognized by other people for what they do? Isn’t this first a question of ME, do I study for MYSELF first, or to be seen by others with a nice Sorbonne diploma? (btw I hope he doesn’t read this-although he could make things clear)
Sounds familiar
Hi Florina,
I’m glad this topic caught your interest! From what I understand for your mate the goal of education is a mixture of career advancement, income, success, all of these being related to achieving a certain status and prestige…
I have yet to hear someone saying they’re studying for the sheer plaeasure of studying, which is not to say that’s not part of the learning process. As a student, I loved studying and it made me proud of myself. My intimate goal of learning was and still is gaining knowledge, becoming better as a person after all…
But it would be hypocritical to say I went to university because of my love for studies. I went there because it was the formal path designed to study for a profession, and curiosity, and idealism of course. What I didn’t love was the environment and how the process was instrumentated by the university, the structure of delivering that knowledge and so many other things. So the experience actually managed to do some damage by taking away some of the pleasure of studying. And then of course if somebody like you would have asked me:
Why do you study? I would have bluntly asnwered: to get my diploma and get out of here… to have the minimum requirements to then be able to choose my next learning experience which doesn;t have to be through school.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that it;s all context dependent. On one hand, the answer to this question may very well be eliciting a more complex response than the one we can imagine.On the other, it actually is not between choosing from the potential goals, it’s actually understanding the share of each in this.
That would be me
Excuse me, I am actually studying for the sheer pleasure of learning. Why else would I do it? I will be almost 50 years old when I finish my PhD. It’s not like you can call it an investment!
Ok, but
Was this the same reason you were studying when you were 20?
That would be me TOO
I study in order to be prepared to face the world and of course, the word income comes along too, we can’t say that we don’t care about money, unless we are related to the Queen or sth.^ ^ But what I study, I study because I like it, I think I might be good at it and whatever comes to study next (I’m talking about the master’s, because now I’m doing a bachelor’s)… So yes, people should do it for pleasure too, it might make life easier.