Some further notes after talking to @simonaferlini:
Minimum viable product
- The “Coronavirus citizen defense kit” (???)
- A knowledge base on dealing with SARS-CoV-2 on the ground, debunking the various myths (including those that have been encoded into rules and regulations).
- Multilingual.
- With a minimal social infrastructure (someone to ask for further info to; someone who can retrieve the original contributors, etc.)
- Communities mostly involved: health care workers (“go running, it’s good for you”); psychologists (“let children play in parks”); lawyers (defending the rights of citizens from police abuse).
Value proposition
- A map of bad practices. Many of those have been imposed not because they make any epidemiological sense, but only because they make police repression easier.
- Giving people tools to push back against bad guidelines, bad regulations, bad laws. If a cop gives me a hard time because I am running, I can quote medical evidence saying that running is good for my health, and carries almost no risk of transmitting the disease. Maybe I still get fined, but I am better equipped for my court hearing.
Actionables:
- @markomanka to ask for WHO endorsement on this.
- As soon as we have that (or they say no) we coordinate on doing the application that @nadia mentioned. We put some money on community managers/interviewers, running the community infrastructure?
More info and reflections
The epidemics has an epistemic dimension. Phylosophically, the idea of “evidence-based medicine” (or -policy, or -whatever), forgets that evidence, in science, is not dogma. It is the opposite of dogma; it comes in to change, and enrich, our way of thinking. It renegotiates the analysis of the situation with respect to the rest of reality. In an interlocked system, reality has many ways to kill you: if you shut down the economy to fight the epidemics, people might die anyway, because infrastructures fall into disrepair. It does make sense to weigh the health benefits of lockdown against its economic costs. This is not necessarily the same thing as being inhuman, or greedy.
- Marco talks to firstline doctors, who are completely lost.
- Simona is more focused on the mistakes made at the level of health education (what are vaccines, how do they operate?) and community engagement (people only see repression, and repression is the only thing there is because there was no preparedness, no participation in creating contingency plans etc.). Guidelines exist (not obviously for this virus, but for similar hypothetical vira); community experiences also exist (Ebola), but they were not applied.
- There is a medical level and a societal level. At the medical level, doctors take orders from bosses. At the societal level, society takes advice from doctors. Or it should. Instead, a repressive system kicks in: staying in is bad for health, but it makes police control easier. Hospital doctors, in Italy, have underwritten this idea, that has no medical grounding whatsoever. However, society pushes back: we only see repression, we do not see active work waiting for solutions, and this reduces the legitimacy of the leadership.
- Infodemic: super high levels of noise make it really difficult to know what is true. The masks debate is exhibit A.