Why editing work?
Hi @Federico_Monaco . I took the liberty to move this into a new wiki as the Abstract is finalized and that discussion finished. New slate 
I am reluctant to make the discussion in Geneva about writing the paper, but more about the core concepts, proposals (your SECTION ONE) and considerations (SECTION THREE). With the editing work, did you have in mind working out a plan already for writing it? That I think we can do amongst the authors and would require a working session, less a public facing meeting like the one we will be having. For the agenda in Geneva I had suggested this, have a look? Each part is led by one author so that we each have time to prepare and lead the discussions. With some improvements, it could look like this maybe?
I. Introduction and recap of analytical work 15’ (Federico Monaco): presenting a synthesis/patchwork of our online conversation, key concepts in consideration, hypotheses, expectations regarding the paper
II. What constitutes action in opencare: scenario building 15’ (Noemi Salantiu): presenting case studies from the community and fitness for analysis (eg conversations for actions A. for understanding & sharing info and B. for doing things together)
III. Scientific framework for analysis: a design proposal informed by expost criteria for types of interactions 20’ (Ezio Manzini)
IV. Q&A and open discussion: exploring new threads of research and future publications (all)