From Talk to Action paper: team finally resumes work

Workspaces OpenCare
,
2

https://edgeryders.eu/en/node

  1. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/7850
  2. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6952
  3. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6678
  4. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6795
  5. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/7042
  6. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6664
  7. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6890
  8. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6422
  9. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6729
  10. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6514
  11. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6827
  12. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6438
  13. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6746
  14. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6672
  15. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6389
  16. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6642
  17. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/6633
  18. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/7946
  19. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/7922
  20. https://edgeryders.eu/en/node/7996

Hi team,

So— we have 20 stories that include the “Connection Made on Site” code. Perfect, I think, for our purposes. I talked with Noemi this afternoon, and here is what we propose:

Split the stories 4 ways (5 each):

I’ve gone through the stories and grouped them into categories based on topic, and assigned them to the people in the group who I think will be most interested/have the most expertise.

Federico: 1,2,6 (Open Insulin), 20 (your meetup with Rune), and 13 (Trauma Tour, because it’s a rich interesting one to try out the algo you and Guy came up with on)

Noemi: 5, 7, 9, 10, 15 (refugee camps and community agriculture)

Ezio: 3, 12, 14, 16, 17 (design, policy)

Amelia: 4, 8, 11, 18, 19 (disability and public health education)

Next step: everyone read the stories with these questions in mind:

  1. What is the nature of the connection made? What kinds of people have connected, and around what particular topic/aspect of the story?

  2. What further action was taken? (e.g. Skype call, in person meeting, etc).

  3. What are the main themes of the story, and what kind of call to action is the orignal story making?

  4. Did the original storyteller ask for help of any kind to further their project? If so, what kind?

Comparatively:

  1. Across your stories, can you sense any kind of common theme? Topically? Structurally? In terms of the call to action?

  2. Did the stories follow any kind of pattern?

  3. Are there common users across the stories? Is there a particularly active user or group of users?

Use your intuiton and take notes on your impressions of the stories. Think about them in relation to the larger Open Care dataset, and reflect upon whether they feel different in any meaningful way.

Next, use GraphRyder to guide your further analysis of the stories.

  1. Go here: http://164.132.58.138:9000/#/dashboard/tagView

  2. Search for “connection made on site” in the tag view (NOT the tag view full) and find your story.

  3. Explore what other tags are used in your stories. Are there commonalities between stories? Within stories? The key question you want to answer: are there particular tags that are associated with connections made on site? If so, what are they?

  4. Play around and get creative! Any interesting observations from this angle?

Let’s have the call tomorrow and discuss any questions or comments we have on this starting methodology. Since Federico can’t make it we can keep it short and really dive in to the proper discussion in a few weeks time once we’ve all had some time with our stories. Sound good?

@Noemi @Ezio_Manzini @Federico_Monaco  and @Alberto @Jason_Vallet @melancon for good measure :slight_smile: