So, it seems Matera is interested in hosting the first Unmonastery after all. I will be meeting with the director of the Matera 2019 committee and the mayor on tthe first week of September. Will keep you posted.
Meanwhile, I have come up with an interesting (and quite sensitive) question. We all would like the Unmonastery to be a success: so, in an ideal world, we would get a ton of people who want to join. That would mean someone has to, somehow, make a selection between people who get an invitation and people who don’t. How do you think this decision should be made? And who should make it?
A possible approach could be to merge the selection process with a process built to ensure that the projects developed within the Unmonastery resonate with the local community. For example, you could get a pool of local projects, needs and people as a knowledge base; candidate Unmonks of all genders would angle their projects so as to maximize local impact and interaction, and then post them somewhere online; we could then involve the local people in the selection of Unmonks and their projects, based on the collaboration they see happening. The whole thing looks like matchmaking: great for ensuring collaboration, but I would hate to see great ideas go to waste because they don’t match with anything on the ground – the whole point of having the Unmonastery in a place like Matera is to inject some novelty.
Difficult. What do you think? What would you consider a fair, efficient selection process?
Other unmonastery links - all discussions stil open, feel free to join!