a reflection… i wonder if one person for taking minutes during the meeting with the architects is enough, as that person probably won’t be present in all meetings => maybe we should leave this one out?
Maybe make a document for the minutes , and try to add who’s going to be present at what date (a bit in advance) and right away indicate who of them will be taking minutes…??
1 Like
Agreed! I thought that point was referring to next Wednesday only 
1 Like
Hi, sorry for lateness in discussion and poll. I don’t understand why coordination with Lie is a separate task. Don’t we coordinate with teams?
both: with teams and roles (here lie in her role of reef coordinator).
Got it.
Maybe adding another task: encoding bills of team building in free agent , see post Alberto Land surveyor (géomètre) - #37 by els
1 Like
Ok, let’s discuss this tomorrow then
Hello @reef-building,
I would like to follow up to yesterday’s meeting with the architects with a couple of thoughts.
Oak Tree: it’s a complicated question, but it’s mostly a Team Inclusion issue, so I would recommend to not invest your energy in this.
Finalising the esquisse phase: the architects mentioned that the aspirational deadline is the end of October, and that they need three things to be confirmed by us: “gabaris, nombre de logements et implantation”. Would you be willing to present to the group a schedule / planning on what we need to make it there? I’m thinking a simple planning, based on your meetings with the architects, possibly together with a revised schedule for the plenary meetings, and a list of topics that you think we need to consent to. Would that work?
Plenary meeting agenda: please feel free to introduce as many lines as you see fit. Given that everything is a bit in motion, I expect we may do some reshuffling ahead of the consent to the agenda, but we’ll have to see.
1 Like
@reef-building @Lee
Here is the document with all the questions that followed from the plenary. https://c301.nl.tabdigital.eu/f/179465
I tried to identify points that still need clarifying, and for now I have inserted questions to be answered by reeflings. My idea is to get a sense of whether there already is a consensus on these topics or whether they need to be discussed in plenary. There might be better ways to go about it but I don’t have the brain power to come up with something else right now, happy for anybody to jump in and change that if it doesn’t work.
I’m really not doing so well tonight and I struggled a lot doing this, I am really not sure if it’s ok, I feel it is quite unclear. So sorry in advance.
@Lee I feel that your idea was for us to make a proposal. Do you still want that or are things ok as they are? Could we be building the proposal together during the plenary?
Atm anyway there are too many balls in the air for me to make a proposal, and I’m not thinking clear enough.
I also didn’t get time to work on the financial questions (extra costs to foresee), but these won’t need input from the Reeflings so I feel that it is not needed tonight. Full disclosure, I don’t think I will have time to work on it before wednesay night, unless tomorrow goes incredibly smoothly or if I finish early enough to do some work before plenary…
Also the folder is a bit messy, I’m gonna have to go through it and gather questions before our next meeting with them, but I don’t expect there are urgent questions left in there for now.
2 Likes
Hi again @reef-building and @Lee,
Here is the document with the extra cost: Login – Nextcloud. Els hasn’t had time to look at it yet, so it will need so re-editing.
2 Likes
Thanks so much @Sarah! The document with all the document looks very complete, and the organisation into “attribution”, “implanatation” etc makes it easy to navigate it.
If you agree I can prepare a Powerpoint for tomorrow’s plenary meeting, in which I would try to summarize the key points, with the hope that at the end of the meeting this will lead us to a list of points that we consent to as the major issues, so that these can be sent on Wednesday. Does that work?
1 Like
Yes! Thanks for taking this up!
@reef-building @alberto
Here a poll to pick a date to have some explanation on freeAgent
- friday 25/10 18:00-18:30
- friday 25/10 18:30-19:00
- friday 25/10 19:00-19:30
- friday 25/10 19:30-20:00
- saturday 26/10 right after the plenary if it takes place
- sunday 27/10 18:30-19:00
- sunday 27/10 19:00-19:30
- sunday 27/10 19:30-20:00
- monday 28/10 18:30-19:00
- monday 28/10 19:00-19:30
- monday 28/10 19:30-20:00
- wednesday 30/10 18:00-18:30
- wednesday 30/10 18:30-19:00
- wednesday 30/10 19:00-19:30
0
voters
not 100 % sure about Friday but let’s see what everyone says 
1 Like
If the plenary finishes early like 12-12.30pm, then I could join potentially but it depends how long it would be for…
Not sure about the plenary though, I might need to skip it 
The solution is this:
- François and Serge need Nextcloud accounts. I created them, using the same email accounts they use for Edgeryders.
- These accounts are assigned to a group of users called “Architects” (not really necessary, but more elegant). They are not part of the Reeflings group.
- I created a folder called “Stekke and Fraas folder” within the Team Building folder
- I shared that folder with the Architects group.
This should give François and Serge access to that folder and any sub-folder we may create, but not to the superfolder (Team Building).
2 Likes
Alberto, perfect. We’ll request the architects to start using this folder for the exchange of documents between team Building and themselves. Nice that any subfolder inherits the authorisations.
1 Like