Following up to our review session in February (The State of The Reef 2024: chronicles from the review meeting) I wanted to create a mini-post about Team Facilitation (ping @reef-facilitation).
TL;DR:
-
I think it is important that we invest more time and energy in researching and practicing facilitation methods for big groups, like e.g. deep democracy, fish bowls, coloured hat method etc.
-
It’s ok for me if people sign up for Team Facilitation without any prior knowledge, but I don’t feel comfortable with the idea of people facilitating our meetings without a minimum of sociocracy training.
Further details:
One thing that I would like to get more clarity about is the aim of the Team, which to me is not only to facilitate plenary meetings and provide training and support to team facilitators, but also to actively research facilitation methods for big groups. Examples could include deep democracy, fish bowls, coloured hats methods etc. With our group getting bigger and the stakes getting higher, the latter is now becoming urgent and important to me.
The other thing that doesn’t feel right to me is the membership process for Team Facilitation. What I see is that people were signing up for Team Facilitation without much of an idea of what facilitation entails, and whether it is actually something they enjoy and/or are good at. I also feel uncomfortable about the idea of people facilitating our meetings without a minimum of sociocracy training.
In part this should now be solved by the proposal to move consent on the teams set-up to the end of the associate membership stage (Teams set-up process: moving it to the end of the Associate Membership stage?)
Proposed action points:
-
Invest more time and energy in alternative facilitation methods for big group (preferably with a deadline)
-
Move consent to team membership to the end of the associate membership stage (becoming an informal member earlier on is of course always possible)
-
Organise facilitation trainings (I’m coming up with that shortly now)